Logo

Digital Copyright by Jessica Litman

Large book cover: Digital Copyright

Digital Copyright
by

Publisher: Michigan Publishing Services
Number of pages: 208

Description:
Jessica Litman questions whether copyright laws crafted by lawyers and their lobbyists really make sense for the vast majority of us. Should every interaction between ordinary consumers and copyright-protected works be restricted by law? Is it practical to enforce such laws, or expect consumers to obey them? What are the effects of such laws on the exchange of information in a free society?

Home page url

Download or read it online for free here:
Read online
(online html)

Similar books

Book cover: Open AccessOpen Access
by - The MIT Press
In this concise introduction, Peter Suber tells us what open access is, how it benefits authors and readers, how we pay for it, how it avoids copyright problems, how it has moved from the periphery to the mainstream, and what its future may hold.
(8892 views)
Book cover: What if we could reimagine copyright?What if we could reimagine copyright?
by - ANU Press
The leading international thinkers represented in this collection reconsider copyright's fundamental questions: the subject matter that should be protected, the ideal scope and duration of those rights, and how it should be enforced.
(6315 views)
Book cover: Intellectual Property: Law and the Information SocietyIntellectual Property: Law and the Information Society
by - Center for the Study of the Public Domain
This open coursebook is an introduction to intellectual property law, the set of private legal rights that allows individuals and corporations to control intangible creations and marks, and the exceptions and limitations that define those rights.
(8818 views)
Book cover: Against Intellectual PropertyAgainst Intellectual Property
by - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The author argues that the existence of patents, copyrights and trademarks are contrary to a free market. They all use the state to create artificial scarcities of non-scarce goods and employ coercion in a way that is contrary to property rights.
(13182 views)