Simple Justice
by Charles Murray
Publisher: Civitas Book Publisher 2005
ISBN/ASIN: 1903386446
ISBN-13: 9781903386446
Number of pages: 131
Description:
In his essay Simple Justice, the celebrated American sociologist Charles Murray provides an uncompromising restatement and defence of the backward-looking, retributive justification of criminal punishment. He also makes an impassioned plea for England to revert to this approach to dealing with convicted offenders, something, he claims, it did until comparatively recently, when those administering its criminal justice system replaced it with a more complex, non-retributive approach.
Download or read it online for free here:
Download link
(340KB, PDF)
Similar books
Manifest Madness: Mental Incapacity in the Criminal Lawby Arlie Loughnan - Oxford University Press
Understanding the terrain of mental incapacity in criminal law is notoriously difficult; it involves tracing overlapping and interlocking legal doctrines, current and past practices. This book provides a close study of mental incapacity defences.
(3126 views)
Encyclopedia of Law and Economicsby Boudewijn Bouckaert, Gerrit De Geest - Edward Elgar Publishing
A reference work that surveys the entire literature on law and economics in over 3,000 pages. The entries consist a review of the literature and a bibliography which covers most of the published material in the particular area.
(12130 views)
Goverment Regulation and the Legal Environment of Businessby Don Mayer, et al. - The Saylor Foundation
Up-to-date textbook that covers legal issues that students must understand in today's business environment. It covers contracts, consumer credit transactions, bankruptcy, intellectual property, securities regulation, regulation of real estate, etc.
(3066 views)
Outline of U.S. Legal Systemby George Clack - U. S. Department of State
This Outline covers the history and organization of the federal and state judicial systems; the criminal and civil court processes; the qualifications and selection of federal judges; the role of other participants in the judicial process.
(7676 views)