**The Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometry**

by D.M.Y. Sommerville

**Publisher**: G.Bell & Sons Ltd. 1914**ISBN/ASIN**: 0486442225**Number of pages**: 158

**Description**:

Renowned for its lucid yet meticulous exposition, this text follows the development of non-Euclidean geometry from a fundamental analysis of the concept of parallelism to such advanced topics as inversion and transformations. It features the relation between parataxy and parallelism, the absolute measure, the pseudosphere, and Gauss' proof of the defect-area theorem.

Download or read it online for free here:

**Download link**

(multiple formats)

Download mirrors:**Mirror 1**

## Similar books

**Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of its Development**

by

**Roberto Bonola**-

**Open Court Publishing Company**

Examines various attempts to prove Euclid's parallel postulate - by the Greeks, Arabs and Renaissance mathematicians. It considers forerunners and founders such as Saccheri, Lambert, Legendre, Gauss, Schweikart, Taurinus, J. Bolyai and Lobachewsky.

(

**5874**views)

**The Elements Of Non-Euclidean Geometry**

by

**Julian Lowell Coolidge**-

**Oxford At The Clarendon Press**

Chapters include: Foundation For Metrical Geometry In A Limited Region; Congruent Transformations; Introduction Of Trigonometric Formulae; Analytic Formulae; Consistency And Significance Of The Axioms; Geometric And Analytic Extension Of Space; etc.

(

**7973**views)

**Non-Euclidean Geometry**

by

**Henry Manning**-

**Ginn and Company**

This book gives a simple and direct account of the Non-Euclidean Geometry, and one which presupposes but little knowledge of Mathematics. The entire book can be read by one who has taken the mathematical courses commonly given in our colleges.

(

**9868**views)

**Euclid's Parallel Postulate: Its Nature, Validity and Place in Geometrical Systems**

by

**John William Withers**-

**Open Court Publishing Co.**

The parallel postulate is the only distinctive characteristic of Euclid. To pronounce upon its validity and general philosophical significance without endeavoring to know what Non-Euclideans have done would be an inexcusable blunder ...

(

**3354**views)