**Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of its Development**

by Roberto Bonola

**Publisher**: Open Court Publishing Company 1912**ISBN/ASIN**: 0486600270**Number of pages**: 292

**Description**:

Examines various attempts to prove Euclid's parallel postulate - by the Greeks, Arabs and Renaissance mathematicians. Ranging through the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, it considers forerunners and founders such as Saccheri, Lambert, Legendre, W. Bolyai, Gauss, Schweikart, Taurinus, J. Bolyai and Lobachewsky.

Download or read it online for free here:

**Download link**

(multiple formats)

## Similar books

**The Elements Of Non-Euclidean Geometry**

by

**Julian Lowell Coolidge**-

**Oxford At The Clarendon Press**

Chapters include: Foundation For Metrical Geometry In A Limited Region; Congruent Transformations; Introduction Of Trigonometric Formulae; Analytic Formulae; Consistency And Significance Of The Axioms; Geometric And Analytic Extension Of Space; etc.

(

**7922**views)

**The Elements of Non-Euclidean Plane Geometry and Trigonometry**

by

**Horatio Scott Carslaw**-

**Longmans, Green and co.**

In this book the author has attempted to treat the Elements of Non-Euclidean Plane Geometry and Trigonometry in such a way as to prove useful to teachers of Elementary Geometry in schools and colleges. Hyperbolic and elliptic geometry are covered.

(

**5213**views)

**Non-Euclidean Geometry**

by

**Henry Manning**-

**Ginn and Company**

This book gives a simple and direct account of the Non-Euclidean Geometry, and one which presupposes but little knowledge of Mathematics. The entire book can be read by one who has taken the mathematical courses commonly given in our colleges.

(

**9808**views)

**Euclid's Parallel Postulate: Its Nature, Validity and Place in Geometrical Systems**

by

**John William Withers**-

**Open Court Publishing Co.**

The parallel postulate is the only distinctive characteristic of Euclid. To pronounce upon its validity and general philosophical significance without endeavoring to know what Non-Euclideans have done would be an inexcusable blunder ...

(

**3303**views)