Logo

Accelerating Universe: Theory versus Experiment

Small book cover: Accelerating Universe: Theory versus Experiment

Accelerating Universe: Theory versus Experiment
by

Publisher: arXiv
Number of pages: 43

Description:
We present gravitation as a theory in which the coordinates are distances and velocities between galaxies. We show that there are three possibilities for the Universe to expand: decelerating, constant and accelerating, and it is shown that the Universe is now in the latter phase.

Home page url

Download or read it online for free here:
Download link
(600KB, PDF)

Similar books

Book cover: Observers and Splitting Structures in Relativistic ElectrodynamicsObservers and Splitting Structures in Relativistic Electrodynamics
by - arXiv
We introduce a relativistic splitting structure as a means to map equations of electromagnetism from curved four-dimensional space-time to 3-dimensional observer's space. We focus on mathematical structures that are motivated by the physical theory.
(6868 views)
Book cover: Electric and Magnetic Aspects of Gravitational TheoriesElectric and Magnetic Aspects of Gravitational Theories
by - arXiv
This thesis deals with the construction of conserved charges for asymptotically flat spacetimes at spatial infinity in four spacetime dimensions in a pedagogical way. It highlights the difficulties with understanding the gravitational duality...
(7672 views)
Book cover: Einstein for EveryoneEinstein for Everyone
by - Nullarbor Press
Aimed at people who do not know enough physics to understand what Einstein did and why it was so important. The course presents just enough of Einstein's physics to give students an independent sense of what he achieved and what he did not achieve.
(16796 views)
Book cover: Gravitation: from Newton to EinsteinGravitation: from Newton to Einstein
by - arXiv.org
The main goal of this document is to propose a big picture of gravitation, where Einstein's relativity arises as a natural increment to Newton's theory. It is designed for students who do not necessarily have prior knowledge about relativity.
(3574 views)